UFO UAP Wiki — a reference wiki, not a verdict. Read with skepticism. October 3, 2026

Nimitz “Tic Tac” encounter

2004 U.S. Navy radar and visual encounter with an unidentified object off California
Nimitz “Tic Tac” encounter
[ IMAGE PLACEHOLDER ]
F/A-18 cockpit, illustrative
DateNovember 10–14, 2004
LocationPacific Ocean, off San Diego, California, U.S.
TypeMilitary encounter
Investigation
Investigated byU.S. Navy; AARO; ODNI
Key witnessesDavid Fravor; Alex Dietrich; Kevin Day
Official conclusionFootage confirmed authentic; object itself unidentified
StatusConfirmed authentic footageObject unidentified

The Nimitz “Tic Tac” encounter refers to a series of radar and visual contacts with an unidentified aerial object by U.S. Navy personnel during training exercises off the coast of California in November 2004, culminating in a close intercept by two F/A-18 fighter pilots. It became one of the most closely examined UAP cases after the Pentagon confirmed the authenticity of associated video and radar data in 2017–2020.[1]

The encounter

For several days prior, the USS Princeton’s radar operators, including Senior Chief Kevin Day, tracked objects descending from around 80,000 feet to near sea level in seconds, far exceeding known aircraft performance envelopes.[2] On November 14, 2004, pilots Cdr. David Fravor and Lt. Alex Dietrich were vectored to intercept; Fravor described a roughly 40-foot white, oblong object — nicknamed “Tic Tac” for its shape — that mirrored his aircraft’s movements before accelerating away at a speed and manner he said he could not explain.[1] A second aircraft’s infrared pod recorded the object shortly after, producing the footage later known as “FLIR1.”

Official confirmation and assessment

The Department of Defense officially released and authenticated the FLIR1 video (alongside “Gimbal” and “GoFast” from a related 2015 encounter series) in 2020, confirming the footage was genuinely recorded by naval aviators and had not been altered.[3] The 2021 ODNI preliminary assessment listed the case among 144 reviewed and did not attribute it to any known US or foreign technology, natural phenomenon, or airborne clutter, leaving it officially unresolved.[4]

Alternative analyses

Skeptical analyst Mick West has argued that the object’s apparent high-speed rotation in the FLIR1 footage is consistent with a camera-tracking artifact, and that some elements of the pilots’ verbal accounts may reflect the well-documented difficulty of estimating distance, size, and speed for small objects seen through an infrared pod at altitude.[5] Fravor and other witnesses have rejected this explanation, maintaining that the object’s acceleration and radar-confirmed altitude changes exceeded any plausible sensor artifact or known aircraft. As of the most recent AARO historical reporting, the case remains catalogued as unidentified rather than explained.[6]

See also

References

  1. ^ Cooper, H.; Kean, L.; Blumenthal, R. (2017). “2 Navy Airmen and an Object That ‘Accelerated Like Nothing I’ve Ever Seen’.” The New York Times.
  2. ^ Day, K. Congressional and media testimony, 2021–2023.
  3. ^ U.S. Department of Defense (2020). Statement confirming authenticity of leaked UAP videos.
  4. ^ Office of the Director of National Intelligence (2021). Preliminary Assessment: Unidentified Aerial Phenomena.
  5. ^ West, M. (2021). “What You’re Seeing In That Navy UFO Video.” metabunk.org.
  6. ^ All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (2024). Historical Record Report, Vol. I.
Categories: Incidents United States 2004 Unexplained